broadwaybound: (☀ → I will pee on everything you love)
Rachel Berry ☆ ([personal profile] broadwaybound) wrote in [community profile] dramadramaduck2012-03-17 03:51 pm

oo9 ☆ [anonymous] ☆



[Rachel decided to take matters into her own hands, Sebastian-style. No murders, no poking anyone's eye out, just publicly smearing his name and reputation. Someone is pissed about being compared to Rebecca Black.

Again, this post is ANONYMOUS, not that Rachel is fooling much of anyone... :'|]
potatochips: (I'd rather be on tumblr)

[personal profile] potatochips 2012-03-17 09:14 pm (UTC)(link)
The most recent posts are an immature quiz, a mention of romantic comedies, and this.

I'm not even sure what to think anymore.

[video] Rachel...seriously....you ain't fooling him

[personal profile] sexbastian 2012-03-17 09:22 pm (UTC)(link)
You are so obvious, it's painful.

Hudson wouldn't be able to write that without grammar mistakes, Santana would go for something more hurtful, Kurt is ignoring me, so....Rebecca, you are ridiculous.

[Have some golf clapping.]
deadlydoctor: (Come again?)

[personal profile] deadlydoctor 2012-03-17 09:26 pm (UTC)(link)
What is a Glist?
notasinglelady: (Rachel what are you doing?)

[personal profile] notasinglelady 2012-03-17 09:34 pm (UTC)(link)
...uh? Why I am part of that list?
whisperingsaint: (huh)

[personal profile] whisperingsaint 2012-03-17 09:43 pm (UTC)(link)
Rachel's number is a little low, to be honest. Not that a gentleman would ever kiss and tell.
whisperingsaint: (hey)

[personal profile] whisperingsaint 2012-03-17 09:53 pm (UTC)(link)
...why, Miss Berry, I am scandalized by what you're implying.
jailbirds: (it leaves you feeling pretty hollow)

[personal profile] jailbirds 2012-03-17 09:55 pm (UTC)(link)
Eeh, -43 is too high for that sack of shit, don't you think?
whisperingsaint: (maybe)

[personal profile] whisperingsaint 2012-03-17 09:56 pm (UTC)(link)
I'm just saying. She's clearly an attractive girl. Her number should be higher. Of course, no one appreciates her beauty the way they should so it's understandable.
whitechocolate: (026)

[personal profile] whitechocolate 2012-03-17 09:58 pm (UTC)(link)
I really don't think all the girls should be under me...

...That sounded dirtier out loud than it did in my head.
baaaaseball: (Listen to me.)

[personal profile] baaaaseball 2012-03-17 10:00 pm (UTC)(link)
Hey, where was this test, and how come I wasn't invited?
pettedasnake: (Really?)

[personal profile] pettedasnake 2012-03-17 10:01 pm (UTC)(link)
I'm hotter than that.
jailbirds: (go ahead and bat your eyes)

[personal profile] jailbirds 2012-03-17 10:02 pm (UTC)(link)
Maybe you should have put in some other comparisons so that we had a sense of scale, though. For example, having dog vomit ranked at 500...
baaaaseball: (Oh?)

[personal profile] baaaaseball 2012-03-17 10:04 pm (UTC)(link)
Aaaah, that makes sense.

I didn't know it was possible to score negatively though. That would mean that you had to take more points away than he could lose. Is he really that bad?

Page 1 of 6