(no subject)

[not-a-wanker.livejournal.com]

The dates on all of your posts are off by 32 years. Fix it. Now.

How do you expect a man to get any work done with such grievous errors staring him in the face? Aren't there any other people in the world who can do their jobs right?

Comments

[uebersoldat.livejournal.com]

32 years? 1970 is accurate.

[not-a-wanker.livejournal.com]

You're 6 years behind the times.

[breakhisknees.livejournal.com]

Time is irrelevant in these situations.

[not-a-wanker.livejournal.com]

What are you, Italian? Time is everything.

[ichigos-dad.livejournal.com]

I LOVE THE 70s!

[not-a-wanker.livejournal.com]

They did just make the W123. I guess it isn't so bad.

1/2

[smackedhischeek.livejournal.com]

... 32 years? How long ago would that be?

2/2

[smackedhischeek.livejournal.com]

... 1976?!

[donuts-plz.livejournal.com]

How would you fix it? I barely figured out how to get this thing working.

[not-a-wanker.livejournal.com]

Hit the 'Edit' text.

[doyouhearthem.livejournal.com]

Looks like someone doesn't understand time dilation.

[donuts-plz.livejournal.com]

Time dilation?

[milk-assassin.livejournal.com]

No it's not. Mine's perfectly the correct date.

[not-a-wanker.livejournal.com]

It's wrong.

[stripping.livejournal.com]

There are about a thousand people on this website whose posts are dated in the 2000s. You're the first one I've seen who's claimed that it's in the 1970s. You don't think you might be the one who's wrong?

[not-a-wanker.livejournal.com]

No.

[deadpan-sadist.livejournal.com]

Fix yours first.



I get my job done right the way I want to.

[not-a-wanker.livejournal.com]

The date of my post is correct.

[jagan-glare.livejournal.com]

Who died and made you the boss around here?

[not-a-wanker.livejournal.com]

Fortunately or unfortunately, it wasn't necessary for anyone to die in this case.

[redheadedspy.livejournal.com]

I'd say it's closer to a thousand years.

Then again, I doubt my world has the same calendar as the rest.

[not-a-wanker.livejournal.com]

There's no other worlds. Don't start that.

[attorneyatlol]

From what I've heard, most of the members here are from the year 2008. Seems people like you and I are in the minority.

[not-a-wanker.livejournal.com]

They're trying to play mind games but they're not going to break me.

[licensed-tokill.livejournal.com]

Thirty two years ago would be 1950. I highly doubt that it's actually 1950.

[not-a-wanker.livejournal.com]

It's 1976, and take that eyeshadow off.

[and-dont-blink.livejournal.com]

[nighttimeshades.livejournal.com]

Why does it matter that much to you? You're behind on the times anyways.

[not-a-wanker.livejournal.com]

Mistakes are a distraction. They should be fixed when they're found.

[oceanicbutterfly]

...you again.

Well, if you'd like to go around changing every calendar in Tokyo to read 1975 or 2039 instead of 2007, then by all means, be my guest.

[not-a-wanker.livejournal.com]

I could care less if all of Japan is wrong. Their calendars aren't in Bonn.

Making a site accessible by the world and having such an egregious error is unacceptable.

[samuraiprosecutor]

The dates on all of your posts are off by 43 years. Perhaps you should fix that.

[not-a-wanker.livejournal.com]

My clocks are all set perfectly. I don't need a fruit to correct me.

[nonesodangerous.livejournal.com]

The dates on my posts are set to relative community time, i.e., relative to the year on the world that this community was created on.

Yours, however, is behind that time by 32 years, and is in fact behind my time by 332. It would seem that rather than there being an error in dates, you are simply on a different world, running on a different time.

However, looking at your other responses, you will simply choose to not believe this explanation. I thought the same things too, until the viruses started. I suppose it's only a matter of time before your own irrefutable proof becomes apparent.

[not-a-wanker.livejournal.com]

Or perhaps too many of you are too easily manipulated.

[sun-cutie-plz.livejournal.com]

Oh dear.

I'm afraid that's not acceptable cutie. You see, where I am the date is perfectly correct. Besides, why would I change it for you~?

I do my job perfectly thank you.

[not-a-wanker.livejournal.com]

I am not your cutie. Don't ever call me that again.

[robotany.livejournal.com]

2783? 2847?

[not-a-wanker.livejournal.com]

1976.

...What sort of mechanism are you?