Doc Scratch (
docfoul) wrote in
dramadramaduck2012-02-22 08:36 pm
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
Entry tags:
> Sandbag.
[I know some of you believe I am not forthcoming enough with my information.
First, I must say this is untrue. I am exactly as forthcoming as I should be.
Second, I don't actually care what these people believe.
But, in the spirit of good will, I will share some observations I have made, in hopes that they will spark interesting discussion as well.
Those present in this community are, or will soon be, depending on the duration of their presence, well familiar with the concept of multiple worlds. But many take "worlds" and "universes" as synonyms, when there is a great chance this is not the case.
This is a fact: each world has its own set of rules.
This is another fact: there are countless universes within my world that follow the same rules.
This, then, would appear to be blatantly untrue: one world corresponds to one universe.
I trust the logic is simple enough even for the less gifted to follow.
Let us delve on the subject of worlds and their rules, then.
If rules are constant across universes, but not worlds, could it be that the community takes advantage of this in some way?
Could the community alter one universe, but not another within the same world?
Or is the community incapable of changing the basic rules of one world, regardless of how many universes it contains?
Or, suppose the community blurs the lines between world and universe, making the distinction meaningless beyond semantics.
What then?
Discuss, for the enjoyment of those not already cognizant of what you will say.]
First, I must say this is untrue. I am exactly as forthcoming as I should be.
Second, I don't actually care what these people believe.
But, in the spirit of good will, I will share some observations I have made, in hopes that they will spark interesting discussion as well.
Those present in this community are, or will soon be, depending on the duration of their presence, well familiar with the concept of multiple worlds. But many take "worlds" and "universes" as synonyms, when there is a great chance this is not the case.
This is a fact: each world has its own set of rules.
This is another fact: there are countless universes within my world that follow the same rules.
This, then, would appear to be blatantly untrue: one world corresponds to one universe.
I trust the logic is simple enough even for the less gifted to follow.
Let us delve on the subject of worlds and their rules, then.
If rules are constant across universes, but not worlds, could it be that the community takes advantage of this in some way?
Could the community alter one universe, but not another within the same world?
Or is the community incapable of changing the basic rules of one world, regardless of how many universes it contains?
Or, suppose the community blurs the lines between world and universe, making the distinction meaningless beyond semantics.
What then?
Discuss, for the enjoyment of those not already cognizant of what you will say.]
no subject
You seem to enjoy that.
no subject
Or, at least, the very last sentence of my post.]
no subject
no subject
Is that what you think?
Could the previous question be a confirmation, or playful sarcasm?]
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
...Ah, what 'rules' of a world are you talkin' about, White Text Guy-san?
no subject
The flow of time, for instance, or the constraints of space.]
no subject
Why, are ya worried?
no subject
I only wish to foster discussion.]
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
no subject
no subject
If you don't mind.
no subject
How about...
Time?]
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
LATER, IN A LOCKED POST ELSEWHERE...
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
Does the clock have any plot relevance? :B
Other than being something left behind by her parents, not really.
Got it o7
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
Would you still prefer to opt out of the white text? ouo;;
If you please? My sigh sucks and my eyes hurt often ^^'
It's good to know you are your normal self again, I know how stressing can be being in a body that's not your usual one.
No problem!
thanks ♥ you are a sweetheart
Psh it's not a problem at all óuò;;
♥^_^
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
rolfmao...that icon
In the full picture he has a bowl of candy by his side
And here I was imaginign him saying 'draw me like one of yoru french girls'
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
no subject
Well observed.]
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
Can't we just say the community does weird shit to us and our worlds and be done with the discussion?
no subject
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
In my galaxy I control some of these 'worlds' and can travel between them, but I have never underwent a virus that effected all of them.
no subject
Interesting, this selectivity. It seems common.]
no subject
Are not most viruses individual, anyways? They deal with changes in perception or individual bodies, rather than affecting a whole planet.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)