Bane [The Dark Knight Rises] (
gothams_reckoning) wrote in
dramadramaduck2012-11-19 10:44 pm
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
Entry tags:
[voice post]
[The sound of a deep, muffled voice begins speaking as if addressing a large room:]
There has been a rather disturbing lack of cooperation in all of my political science classes. The lack of debate and the apathy towards the state of the world has been very disappointing.
As a result: all political science students must turn in an assignment in a week's time.
The assignment is: Why Democracy Is a Lie, and Why All Governments Are Unjust Tools of the Elite Used to Destroy the Working Man.
All papers must reference at least one government-related atrocity and use statistic to estimate how many have perished at the hands of their government of choice.
[And suddenly Darcy's voice pipes up.]
Woah, woah, woah. Should we give them something a little more open ended? And less...depressing? We want them writing papers, not spiraling into a fit of depression.
What about a paper on Obama vs Romney? They can defend one candidate.
[There is a low, muffled sigh of frustration before Bane adds:]
Or a paper about Romney or Obama. Either is fine.
There has been a rather disturbing lack of cooperation in all of my political science classes. The lack of debate and the apathy towards the state of the world has been very disappointing.
As a result: all political science students must turn in an assignment in a week's time.
The assignment is: Why Democracy Is a Lie, and Why All Governments Are Unjust Tools of the Elite Used to Destroy the Working Man.
All papers must reference at least one government-related atrocity and use statistic to estimate how many have perished at the hands of their government of choice.
[And suddenly Darcy's voice pipes up.]
Woah, woah, woah. Should we give them something a little more open ended? And less...depressing? We want them writing papers, not spiraling into a fit of depression.
What about a paper on Obama vs Romney? They can defend one candidate.
[There is a low, muffled sigh of frustration before Bane adds:]
Or a paper about Romney or Obama. Either is fine.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
Besides, about the only decent thing I ever got out of that Rhetoric class was that arguments work a lot better when you acknowledge the other side's points.
[Leila might have liked that class more than she's letting on, because as far as she's concerned the entire argument is completely academic. She's planning to write on the anti-government side anyway just for the challenge.]
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
I will take the government one. [He had enough few that Obama/Romney/Elections stuff for a lifetimes, thanks.]
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
For one reason or the other.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
[Childish. Hmph.]
no subject
no subject
no subject